.:[Double Click To][Close]:.
Popular Post

6 8 spc vs 6 5 grendel

6 8 spc vs 6 5 grendel. 7.62x51mm NATO, 6.5mm Grendel
  • 7.62x51mm NATO, 6.5mm Grendel



  • kresh
    Jul 19, 05:10 PM
    LongShight i think you mean Vista will be here next year and will be a big cash cow for Microsoft - will it work as well as Mac OS ? no,will it be better ? no ...but people will buy it and still get viruses and spyware



    I don't think that Windows is the reason that people will buy it. It has much more to do with the $499.99 price point, which buys a fairly decent machine for most home users.

    Apple will never, ever dominate in marketshare. They are not geared for it profit margin wise, and I don't think they should be.





    6 8 spc vs 6 5 grendel. I got that off 6.8 SPC
  • I got that off 6.8 SPC



  • picklescott
    Jul 19, 12:20 AM
    An article regarding this is now front page on Netscape's home page.

    http://www.netscape.com/





    6 8 spc vs 6 5 grendel. 6.8 Remington SPC
  • 6.8 Remington SPC



  • NAG
    Jan 12, 06:24 PM
    Thing is it would have to be cheap enough for a hospital to give out to all the doctors and such (I think we're using Epic now or something).





    6 8 spc vs 6 5 grendel. 7mmARk, 6.8 SPC, 6.5 Grendel
  • 7mmARk, 6.8 SPC, 6.5 Grendel



  • Ted Witcher
    Mar 22, 05:38 PM
    Just put it in a YoTank case like I did. You can drive your car over it without damaging the iPod.

    http://www.substrata.ca/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/CJE3140.jpg

    More pics here (http://www.substrata.ca/blog/uncategorized/portable-music-rig/).

    That's an Emmeline DAC? You're not using USB?





    6 8 spc vs 6 5 grendel. 6.5 Grendel, 6.8 SPC,
  • 6.5 Grendel, 6.8 SPC,



  • Mr Fusion
    Apr 21, 10:27 PM
    ... Really? Since privacy issues don't seem to mean squat to some people here, mind handing over your credit card numbers, SSN's, compromising photographs etc. They uh, help improve my networks. ;)





    6 8 spc vs 6 5 grendel. 6.8SPC_6.5 Grendel 6.5
  • 6.8SPC_6.5 Grendel 6.5



  • LostPacket
    Nov 29, 03:50 PM
    With HDMI, they'd have to be shooting higher than 480p. I'd say they'd go all out with 1080p, why not?

    My guess would be too much cost for such a small market. There's not a lot of 1080p content out there and even less 1080p displays. For a first gen device, I think 720p would be good enough. Maybe even 480p if it's cheap enough.

    Although, in the end it'll probably depend on bandwidth limitations. They never said what protocol they'll be using. Some are assuming 802.11n, but that would limit them to the newest Intel Macs with a firmware upgrade.





    6 8 spc vs 6 5 grendel. 6.5 Grendel vs. 6.8 SPC
  • 6.5 Grendel vs. 6.8 SPC



  • Saharaha
    Feb 17, 06:15 PM
    First few posts to the forum! Long time reader though, so I've seen some pretty amazing set ups that put mine to shame.

    College dorm room set up:
    http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h150/Sahara_03/desk.jpg





    6 8 spc vs 6 5 grendel. 6 8 spc vs 6 5 grendel.
  • 6 8 spc vs 6 5 grendel.



  • *LTD*
    Mar 25, 06:26 PM
    This is cool to look at, but it's just a workaround for what should be happening... the Apple TV should run apps / play games. It's an iOS device. There's no need to get crazy with wires hanging off the side of an iPad.

    While I like seeing developers getting creative like this, I don't consider this mainstream gaming. An iPad 2 is $500. A PlayStation 3 is much cheaper.

    Play a great, touch-enabled version of Dead Space - pretty much a landmark in touch-based gaming, then quickly check your e-mail and then pay a bill through your banking app.

    All from the same device. The iPad does a lot things, but it actually does them well. That's pretty significant.





    6 8 spc vs 6 5 grendel. 6 8 spc vs 6 5 grendel. 6.8
  • 6 8 spc vs 6 5 grendel. 6.8



  • quagmire
    Mar 7, 09:57 AM
    But prior to that the Mk1 was the same in both the U.S. & Europe.

    Was only a young kid when that Focus was around.......

    Anyway, when the current US Focus debuted back in 1999 I believe it was, it wasn't a bad car. In typical bad Ford fashion, it was left to rot on the vine. It got a heavy redesign/MCE for the 2008/9 MY I believe it was, but it was too late. The 2012 Focus is so much better. Although I prefer the Chevy Cruze.

    So far this generation of world cars are going fairly well. The Buick Regal is selling in China and in the US fairly well( with the Regal being the Opel Insignia). The Cruze isn't doing too badly either. I don't know the exact number of Cruze sales in Europe, but I heard it was decent. They just sold 18,000 units in February in the US. Holden survives as it is today due to its export business. World cars can be done. They just have to be implemented correctly.





    6 8 spc vs 6 5 grendel. 6.5 Grendel Versus 6.8 SPC
  • 6.5 Grendel Versus 6.8 SPC



  • barmann
    May 2, 08:59 PM
    Haha so many mad fanboys. " APL Y U RUIN MY OSX"

    I think its a neat trinket, deleting apps this way, but nothing major worth over analyzing.

    I was under the impression an Apple fanboy is someone who applauds whatever move Apple makes to lead us into a brighter future .

    Besides, the new feature doesn't delete apps, only applets, if that . ;)





    6 8 spc vs 6 5 grendel. 6.8mm SPC and 6.5mm
  • 6.8mm SPC and 6.5mm



  • iJohnHenry
    Apr 20, 04:58 PM
    Yes, I love driving manual transmission cars. It's fun.

    Yeah, but the others should know that you rely on public transportation, day to day.

    Manual is fun, until you spend a couple of hours, or more, commuting every day.





    6 8 spc vs 6 5 grendel. 6.5 Grendel top, and the 6.8
  • 6.5 Grendel top, and the 6.8



  • SciFrog
    Dec 13, 06:09 PM
    Thanks.

    I was over at kakaostats and saw there is someone new this week "elena" (http://kakaostats.com/usum.php?u=1604130), up only since tuesday and they already have over 4M points! Must be an institution with a wicked fast cluster? Some serious players out there...

    You are #103 cruncher for the whole project, whao!
    And actually #1 and #2 are default user, not real...
    Impressive.

    Can't wait for Gulftown Mac Pros and SMP2 (maybe 60k PPD with one machine?).





    6 8 spc vs 6 5 grendel. 6 5 Grendel. 6 8 Spc Vs 6 5
  • 6 5 Grendel. 6 8 Spc Vs 6 5



  • iJawn108
    Aug 6, 11:03 PM
    "... introducing the 30th anaversary mac retro" :p





    6 8 spc vs 6 5 grendel. parent 6.5 Grendel case.
  • parent 6.5 Grendel case.



  • RaceTripper
    Jan 31, 04:27 PM
    imo, it needs deep dish wheels.. (or ronal turbo's)
    still it's a nice ride non the less!Deep dish wheels are great, if they don't stick out the wheel wells from exaggerated width like a ghetto whip.





    6 8 spc vs 6 5 grendel. 6.5 Grendel and 6.8 SPC.
  • 6.5 Grendel and 6.8 SPC.



  • bommai
    Sep 6, 05:40 PM
    the tv has vga input on it so i just use that an the dvi to vga adapter to connect it to the mini. It's actually really good quality as it is right now. Happy with how it is, plus i don't feel like spending $50 on a single cable haha

    You can get a HDMI cable on line for like $10. You should be able to get a DVI/HDMI adapter pretty cheap too. VGA is so yesterday.





    6 8 spc vs 6 5 grendel. 6.5 Grendel vs. 6.8 SPC
  • 6.5 Grendel vs. 6.8 SPC



  • imac_japan
    May 3, 10:18 AM
    As for me, I think Apple could make some changes but that it is in much better shape than it was, say, eight years ago.

    I agree !! but they need to do more than provide quick cool products...The ipod and the itunes music store isn't going to last because there are going to be others. They need to push a product (ie: cheap mac) into the home ! People will buy it





    6 8 spc vs 6 5 grendel. (the 6.8 SPC and the 6.5
  • (the 6.8 SPC and the 6.5



  • andiwm2003
    Nov 15, 02:32 PM
    So, that means that there's no practical reason Apple couldn't give an 8-core BTO option right away... Say, for around an additional $999? (The 3GHz quad-core model is an additional $799.) For those that need it, the extra $200 would be well worth it. For those that just want the bragging rights, well, I guess they can afford the $200.

    let's see if there will be a cpu market. people buy quadcore chips to max out their 3.0 mac pros. then they sell their 3.0 chips to the owners of 2.0 mac pros. i wish there was a way to put the 2.0 xeons into mac mini's;)





    6 8 spc vs 6 5 grendel. from 6.5 Grendel, 6.8 SPC
  • from 6.5 Grendel, 6.8 SPC



  • chillywilly
    Sep 7, 12:48 PM
    The prices in CompUSa will be dropped on Friday for what they may actually have in stock. They have been constraining them for the past couple weeks. All I have is the display core duo and one box stock core solo. Alot of the apple employees who work in the CompUSAs had extra days off this week due to the holiday (much needed) so they may not have been back into CUSA to let the staff know.

    Kevin
    I think getting a cheaper older model of Mac mini would be great, if the prices were right. It would be a great starter machine for someone that really doesn't care about having the lastest and greatest.





    6 8 spc vs 6 5 grendel. On the subject of 6.8mm,
  • On the subject of 6.8mm,



  • FearNo1
    Apr 22, 09:58 PM
    How is this "common knowledge" when apple supposedly added this all seeing eye feature in 2010? And with al bore on apple's board, that is even more reason to be concerned...

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-13145562
    The men claim that the facility to record users' positions was added with the iOS4 software update, released in June 2010.

    Really? This is common knowledge and is legal. All cell phones have this backdoor built in. Al Gore is on Apple's board. This became law in 2001.





    Gatesbasher
    Mar 24, 02:42 PM
    All of what you said! Especially the part quoted -and the true nut of it that I took the liberty of bolding. The "dumbing down" of our ears continues apace.

    And I forgot to mention things like what (even "HD") radio stations are doing to the signal - e.g., compressing nearly all popular music to a 20 db maximum dynamic range, and in some cases even speeding up the play (while "correcting" for frequency), allowing a better fit with their commercial breaks.

    I wasn't aware of that. I suppose in a car, for example, where there's a high noise floor, reducing the dynamic range might be a good idea—but that should be a knob on your unit, not theirs!

    Edit: The frequency thing kind of reminds me of the old days, when the electric utilities used to bitch and moan that: "We're not selling a timekeeping service!" Even so, while there might not be exactly 60 cycles in every second all day, they'd speed up or slow down a little bit towards midnight to make sure there was exactly 5,184,000 cycles in a day. If your TV picture started rolling late at night, that was probably why!





    Earendil
    Nov 27, 06:02 PM
    Congratulations on starting your point with not one but two violent images... clearly, you must be a real PRO.

    They are figures of speech that are quite common where I live. My apologies if they were taken the wrong way by you.
    And since when did I say I was a Pro?

    This thread is about the possible introduction of a 17" monitor to possibly complement the Mac Mini, Apple's only headless consumer desktop.

    Go Apple if they want to make a consumer monitor to compete with Dell. I'm all for it, as consumer monitors are all I have ever bought. I've already said that though, and I am not at all against Apple doing so, if you think I was, please go re-read my posts, as you might have missed my real point.

    My point is that introducing a new size will do little to plug the consumer-sized hole in Apple's monitor line-up. If Apple can squeeze extra money out of some egotists who like to think of themselves as prosumers, fine, but the overwhelming majority of users aren't going to get anal about some supposed color-accuracy issues: they want a good-quality, good-looking reliable monitor and if Apple can't provide that at a decent price, Apple loses them to someone who can..

    See, that is what my counter point was to. Yes, the thread is about Apple's possible entry into Consumer level LCDs. However by claiming that only "egotists" with a hankering for "supposed" statistics are the ones that buy Apple displays is just insulting. And when your comparison is with a Dell monitor, it just shows ignorance of what the Apple monitors provide.

    You seem to be coming at me as if I stand on some high ground, when in fact I own (as stated in my signature) a 20" wide Dell monitor :cool:
    So just trust me when I say that the difference in my Photographs, and Photo editing on my Dell vs an Apple monitor is different, and a noticeable difference not just in color, but in backlighting and change incolor based on viewing angle. When I'm surfing the web I don't notice/care, or playing games, or just about anything else. And since I don't make money on my photos, or do too much printing, I went with the Dell because the price/benafits ratio did not justify the Apple monitor. I wish Apple had provided a consumer level montior for me to buy, it would go far better with my Powerbook, but they didn't. I'm not going to discount their current line up just because I can't afford it, and I don't think you should discount it just because you don't understand it technically.

    Apple could, of course, bring out two lines of monitors, one for print professionals and one to compete directly with Dell but, of course, they won't because it wouldn't take long for people to realize that there isn't really that much difference.

    I think your conclusion is correct, but I think it is for different reasons. Those that buy Apple monitors either have the money to burn, or actually do want what the monitor provides over Dell. I think the reason they may not is the same reason they don't make cheap computers. Apple afaik has had quality certified monitors for a long time running. It might be confusing if they offer both, as anyone that knows that Apple only sells quality monitors may buy the new less expensive monitor and find out it doesn't do what they think it should.

    However I think that it would be worth it in sales. And worth it for me :D





    roland.g
    Sep 1, 12:49 PM
    23" Imac is a great size. Add HD resolution then that's great.
    I would love to see dual display support. But I highly doubt they will allow it. Apple wants to make sure there is a distinction between their consumer and pro line. It would be cool to have the Imac 23" with a 23" Cinema display next to it.

    You can already do that. The current iMacs support dual display, just not the 30"





    homieg340
    Oct 23, 09:59 PM
    What TIME are the updates on Tuesdays usually made? EST? PST?

    Also, can we be certain that the update is tomorrow? Wouldn't this be too soon for them to update? It seems they've given almost no time for the resellers-then again, does apple usually make suprise announcements, completely out of the blue like this?

    Someone with more experience please clarify.





    Chef Medeski
    Jul 14, 10:46 AM
    Faster processors, I'll take those of course. Blu-Ray? Hell no, I don't want that turd. Pretty much every format Sony has ever come up with is dead, just look at the UMD now, its a joke.

    I'll pass on that MPAA sponsored DRM ladden expensive dog turd.
    UMD wasn't supposed to be a new standard in anything. With the MD, they tried to create new audio players and even a new drive for hte computer, and it was a good format( unlike most sony formats) but since sony was the only one using it.... well.... it went the way of the dinosoars..

    but UMD was never like MD in that they tried pushing it on many fronts, just for PSP. And I think its fairly sucessful for only pertainging to PSP owners.